Skip to contents

Results from 46 studies, including 89 effect sizes (r), on the specificity of future thinking in depression (Gamble et al. 2019)

Usage

data(gamble2019)

Format

A data frame with 89 rows and 20 variables.

  • study_id: Unique id for study

  • samp_id: Unique id for each sample

  • es_id: Unique id for effect size

  • authors: Authors of study

  • yi: Effect size in r

  • vi: Variance of effect size

  • ni: Sample size of study

  • sex: Proportion of study that was female

  • age: Mean age of participants

  • dep_status: Clinical status of depression

  • comorbid_anx: Whehter comorbid with anxiety

  • emo_val: Emotional valence of simulations

  • macro_micro: Macro vs. micro specificity

  • cue_type: Cue type

  • spec_rated: Self- vs. researcher-rated specificity

  • dep_rated: Self- vs. researcher-rated depression

  • cat_dim: Categorical vs. dimensional designs

  • quality: Study quality rating

  • published: Published or not

  • mode: Mode or prospection

References

Gamble B, Moreau D, Tippett LJ, Addis DR (2019). “Specificity of future thinking in depression: A meta-analysis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 816--834.